ETC Green is dedicated to helping our clients identify and develop the best Green Energy opportunities for their properties and investments.  There are several hundred square miles of southern Nevada, northern Arizona and south eastern California that offer the right combination of land value, water and water rights, sunlight and climate for successful, profitable biofuel production.

We read literally dozens of articles and reports on the negative aspects of biofuels most every day.  Most are written by the media though some are coming out of educational institutes and the national labs.  Many if not most are grouping together radically different sources and processing technologies of biofuels where the downside of one source is being presented generically to represent all others.  Even environmentalists have lost proper perspective.

Throughout this website, the following definitions will be used;  while there are still discussions on classification, most organizations now recognize 1st Generation Feedstock for biofuels to be corn, soy, switchgrass, etc..  Basically, those crops that have historically been used for both ethanol and biodiesel over past decades.  The 2nd Generation Feedstocks are by definition, non-food crops that will grow on land where food crops will not.  These include jatropha and yellowhorn.  Some organizations throw micro algae into 2nd Generation Feedstocks (we have done the same for efficiency in communication) and some are now referring to micro algae as the 3rd Generation Feedstock.  Also, it is important to understand that while there are biomass and bio-oil sourced synthetic fuels available from a growing number of labs, the cost of these fuels are still significantly higher than the production costs of ethanol and biodiesel.

While the general public will likely never take the time to understand the details of the variables related to biofuels, legislative decision makers must be committed to this task.  The following is a high level review to identify basic concepts.

Jatropha orchard yields (400 gallons/acre/yr in arid climates up through 1,400 gallons/acre/yr in subtropic climates in controlled, ideal conditions) are well documented by universities and experienced orchard growers.  The media, however, chose to focus on hundreds of 3rd world nation farmers who planted orchards in arid climates and did not install irrigation systems, did not apply fertilizer or have access to mechanical harvesters. So $M's of investment funds were lost and from this example, many declared that jatropha was a not viable solution.  Today hundreds of large multi-national corporations are invested in jatropha and yellowhorn because they make good economic sense when properly managed.

The issue of inconsistent biodiesel quality produced from animal fat and waste vegetable oil does not carry over to biodiesel sourced directly from most plant feedstocks.  The low volume CO² processing of soybeans has no relationship to the high volume CO² processing of other sources such as yellowhorn orchards.  The large land mass and energy requirements to produce biofuels from soy and corn (1st Generation feedstock) are not representative of 2nd Generation feedstock source crops - 1st to 2nd generation feedstock yields are typically a factor of 10 or more.  It is ridiculous to suggest that the decision to clear land with ground fires made by some South American biofuels production firm is a reasonable argument against the production of biodiesel.

Just because several micro algae research companies have failed in recent years is not a definitive justification to suggest that biofuels from micro algae will never be viable.  Consider that bio-oils from micro algae is a proven technology and economically viable industry today - millions of gallons of micro algae sourced bio-oils are produced and used by various industries.  Biodiesel sourced from micro algae is also a proven technology, but is not cost competitive against petroleum today.  Keep in mind that we now have the technologies and resources to generate many times the total annual volume of petroleum extracted from the ground via micro algae.  With economies by scale, most researchers in the industry are projecting that micro algae sourced biodiesel will be produced at near an $80 barrel equivalent within 10 years.  Frankly, it does not matter if the price of micro algae sourced biodiesel drops to what we consider "affordable" as the price of petroleum will generally continue to rise in price.  At some point in the future, the majority of all vehicles (ground, sea and air) in the world will be powered by biodiesel.

The amount of water needed to produce high oil yields from jatropha and other source crops is another common issue cited, but cycling water molecules for biofuel production is radically more sustainable than cycling petroleum molecules or depleting minerals for EV's and hybrids. While 15,000 gallons of water might be pumped via an underground drip irrigation system into a yellowhorn tree to generate 1 gallon of biodiesel, the vast majority of this water is never absorbed by the tree and returns to the watershed to be recycled so there is no real-world loss.  Common agricultural engineering methods include responsible hydrology strategies which are a major and basic component of Industrial Metabolism.

There are also a series of articles currently in the media from a university graduate student suggesting the CO² footprint for micro algae sourced biofuels is much higher than previously believed.  We are at a loss to understand why a Green Energy project such as biofuel from micro algae would create a new fossil fuel dependency rather than to use wind, solar, geothermal, or even a Rankine Cycle from the heat of the coal or natural gas power plant that the micro algae is using as the CO² source.  The media needs more due diligence to weed out these false or uninformed articles regardless of the source institute's reputation or individual's credentials.

Another frustrating aspect of the biofuels business maturation is that market support organizations and industry associations are typically funded by the regional agricultural industry and local, regional or federal governments.  So if a particular crop is not viable in that region (say Nebraska, USA), the local biofuels association will not spend research funding or staff time evaluating a solution that will not directly benefit that local economy.  This issue is seriously effecting the balance of "biofuels reality" as people are not taking the time to understand the specific biofuel source and regional issues.

The solution is to educate and motivate regional agricultural industries, associations and government agencies to understand the variables and to support viable solutions in operations where crops and processing will be successful.  While at the same time, we must face the reality and stop trying to grow biofuel crops that require long term government funding to compensate for a lack of economic viability.  There are 28 million acres of prime US farmland now dedicated to ethanol production and 22 million acres of soy dedicated to biodiesel production.  Both of these are 1st generation feedstocks and need to be returned to food production ASAP.

Biodiesel sourced from 2nd generation feedstock is a solid and almost immediate solution to a large percentage of our transportation fuel needs.  There is, however, a great deal of noise to filter through to understand the issues and opportunities.  Daimler, Toyota, GM, Ford and hundreds of other companies and dozens of nations' governments including the U.S. DOE have completed their research studies and have invested in the best, immediate solution - biodiesel from high-yield 2nd generation feedstocks, Jatropha and Yellowhorn today, and micro algae in the near future.

BioFuel Products:

• Jatropha-Yellowhorn Orchards
• Micro Algae Farming
• Synthetic Diesel / Biodiesel
  

Please contact us for more information on our Biofuels Products and Services.